Insight journal - Dealtalk

A new dimension to Pharma Partnering

Posted on 27 June 2012

Tags: , , ,

Is togetherness the latest drug? Will touchy feeliness be the answer to the pharmaceutical industry's crisis of productivity?  Pharma partnering certainly isn't anything new in the life sciences, but the nature and structure of partnerships is evolving to the point that many companies are now contemplating pooling their resources...and diluting their returns.

Certainly the past decade has been marked by more pharma partnering collaborations between industry and academia, where there has been an effort to find a win-win solution to academia's funding deficits and pharma's desire to get more helping hands in early innovation.

Out of this have grown "open-source" research efforts that use pharma's financial backing to create or aggregate data any researcher can use. Sage Bionetworks, a three-year-old Seattle-based non-profit, offers a "commons" of pooled data and resources. Merck has contributed many human and mouse disease models for open consumption. Eli Lilly has opened up its doors to compounds created at academic labs through its PD2 and other Open Innovation Drug Discovery efforts. In 2008, GlaxoSmithKline released over 300 cell lines to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Bioinformatics Grid, open for academics to mine. The Structural Genomics Consortium is an open-access database of 3-D protein structures that counts Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, and most recently Takeda among its members and financial backers.

While these kinds of open efforts come with a series of challenges concerning ownership, consent and disclosure, and many other issues, they exist because industry increasingly recognizes that biology is too complex for any one company, even a large one, to tackle on its own.

Major drug companies have also started to innovate the way they work with venture capitalists to help nurture early research. Johnson & Johnson announced back in January that it is partnering with Polaris Venture Partners to scout out and co-invest in biotech startups--presumably structuring deals such that venture backers can find an exit without relying on the lousy IPO market. And they're hardly alone--as I highlighted a few months ago.

But now drug companies are starting to do the unthinkable--work directly with each other. They've taken baby steps in this direction before, often with a focus on emerging markets and diseases not viewed as critical profit-drivers. For example, 13 major drug companies joined the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation earlier this year to combat tropical diseases. But rather than just contributing medicine, some of the companies-- Abbott, Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer--are actually collaborating on research as part of the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative. All the companies are sharing compound libraries.

That's not entirely unprecedented, but companies that have wanted to work closely together in the past have formally launched joint ventures, like the HIV-focused ViiV Healthcare venture between Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline.

Now these cooperative efforts are broadening. One announcement made at the recent Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) convention is the formation of a consortium for neuroscience research between seven companies including Biogen, Abbott Labs and Merck. The stakes a fairly small, at least money-wise--each company is only pledging $250,000 at this point. But it is symbolically important that they are sharing all the costs of basic research, as well as their expertise, to try to quickly and efficiently get R&D off the ground.

While some of this newfound camaraderie might be difficult for companies dreaming of developing blockbusters and keeping all the profits to themselves, there is a silver lining. The growing demand for drugs in emerging markets means that some of these collaboratively developed drugs may eventually reach much broader audiences--meaning larger populations over which to recoup development costs, bigger opportunities for rare disease indications, and acceptable profits even if prices are forced lower. That should be some consolation.

Karl Thiel

Read the article at BioSpace (link no longer available)

 

Related

Read: more on partnering deals in pharma, biotech, life science partnering deal news, insights and glossary

Read: Big pharma deal news- latest deal news for top 50 pharma / big pharma companies

Report: Partnering Deals and Alliances with Big Pharma

View: Current Partnering’s Partnering Scorecard – view top life science partnering deals by value

View: Current Partnering’s Deal Metrics – the latest deal trend infographics for life science deal making

View: Current Partnering’s Big Pharma Deal Making Scorecard – latest trends in big pharma deal making activity

View: Current Partnering’s Big Biotech Deal Making Scorecard – latest trends in big biotech deal making activity

Signup: Current Partnering Dealmakers Update – weekly newsletter providing the latest life science industry deal news, deal making trends, partnering events – sign up now

Signup: Current Agreements Deals Review – monthly newsletter - reviewing the previous month’s life science deal making – partnering, M&A and financing – sign up now

Subscribe: Current Agreements life sciences partnering, M&A and financing deals database – find out more

Follow us on: LinkedIn Current Partnering | LinkedIn Business Development Network | @Currentpartner on Twitter

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

 

cabannerad300x150new4gif
rauconbadgejpg
e78banner300x150animgif
cabannerad300x150new4gif
e79banner300x150gif
e78banner300x150animgif